Comparative Study of the Concept of Death according to Seneca and Paul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69668/josaprat.v2i2.164Keywords:
Seneca, Paul, Death, Comparative studyAbstract
Death holds a central place in philosophical and theological reflection and remains a major source of contemporary anxiety, especially within Christian spirituality and pastoral theology. This article compares Seneca’s Stoic understanding of death with Paul’s early Christian vision, focusing on their conceptual frameworks and consolatory strategies. Using qualitative, library-based research, it analyzes Seneca’s De brevitate vitae, Epistulae morales, and selected tragedies alongside key Pauline texts (1 Corinthians 15; Romans 5–8; Philippians 1:21–23; 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18). The comparison is structured around four themes: the ontology of death, eschatology, the constitution of the subject, and modes of consolation. Seneca presents death as a morally neutral and cosmically necessary reality within the order of logos, functioning as philosophical therapy through meditatio mortis and exemplary deaths. Paul, by contrast, depicts death as the enemy and the “wages of sin,” transformed by Christ’s resurrection and communal eschatological hope. These contrasting models offer distinct resources for addressing death anxiety and pastoral care today.
References
Case, B. (2024). Love’s Limits in Paul of Tarsus and Seneca the Younger. Religions, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/REL15101169
Christian, T. J. (2024). The Historical Approach to New Testament Rhetorical Criticism: A Rhetorical Analysis of 1 Corinthians 15. Religions, 15(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010088
Connery, T., & Murphy, M. (2025). Be not afraid?: death anxiety and religious residue in Christian and non-religious participants. Mortality, 30(4), 902–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2024.2418351
Coomans, D. (2024). Mors Individva and Aeqva (Seneca, Troades 401 And 434). Classical Quarterly, 74(1), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838824000235
Currie, M. (2020). Seneca on the Death of M. Livius Drusus (De brevitate vitae 6.1-2). Mnemosyne, 73(5), 775–797. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-12342754)
Edwards, C. (2007). Inwood Reading Seneca. Stoic Philosophy at Rome. The Classical Review, 57(1), 118–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X06003489
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2017). Paul in Philippians and Seneca in Epistle 93 on Life after Death and Its Present Implications. Paul and Seneca in Dialogue, 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004341364_014)
Fantham, E. (2019). Death and The Dead In Seneca’s Troades. Seneca’s Troades, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTVCMXS1T.9
Gaventa, B. R. (2012). First and Second Thessalonians. Westminster John Knox Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/First_and_Second_Thessalonians.html?hl=id&id=57zQq1n-_1AC
Graf, C. (2024a). Natural Disaster, Stupefaction, and Anxiety. Seneca’s Affective Cosmos, 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198907008.003.0003
Graf, C. (2024b). Oedipus Haerens: Paranoid Lagging in Seneca’s Phoenissae*. Classical Antiquity, 43(1), 19–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/CA.2024.43.1.19
Griffiths, P. J. (1999). How Epistemology Matters to Theology. In Source: The Journal of Religion (Vol. 79, Issue 1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/1207040
Hill, T. D. (2004). Ambitiosa Mors. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203492840
Hoffpauir, J. M. (2021). The Road to Freedom. In Political Theory on Death and Dying (pp. 121–131). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003005384-13
Hollon, E. L. (2025). Paul’s Account Of Change At The Resurrection In 1 Corinthians 15:42-44A. 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.14385
Holloway, P. A. (2013). Paul as a hellenistic philosopher: The evidence of philippians. Paul and the Philosophers, 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823292325-003/HTML
Holloway, P. A. (2018). Deliberating Life and Death: Paul’s Tragic Dubitatio in Philippians 1:22–26. Harvard Theological Review, 111(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816018000044
Husain, W., Ammar, A., Trabelsi, K., & Jahrami, H. (2024). Development and validation of Believers’ Death Anxiety Scale: integrating religious dimensions into death anxiety assessment. Discover Mental Health, 4(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/S44192-024-00120-2)
Husain, W., Malik, M. M., Shakeel, A., Riaz, A., Mahnoor, & Jahrami, H. (2024). The Psychopathological Predictors and Effects of Death Anxiety. Omega (United States). https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228241272502
Iverach, L., Menzies, R. G., & Menzies, R. E. (2014). Death anxiety and its role in psychopathology: Reviewing the status of a transdiagnostic construct. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(7), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2014.09.002)
Jong, J. (2021). Death anxiety and religion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.004
Ker, J. (2009a). The Deaths of Seneca. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195387032.001.0001)
Ker, J. (2009b). The Deaths of Seneca. Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387032.001.0001
Ker, J. (2010). The Deaths of Seneca. The Deaths of Seneca, 1–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195387032.001.0001
Kim, S. (2002). The Jesus Tradition in 1 Thess 4.13–5.11. New Testament Studies, 48(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688502000164
Luckensmeyer, D., & Neil, B. (2015). Reading first thessalonians as a consolatory letter in light of Seneca and ancient handbooks on letter-writing. New Testament Studies, 62(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688515000351
Menzies, R. E., & Whittle, L. F. (2022). Stoicism and death acceptance: integrating Stoic philosophy in cognitive behaviour therapy for death anxiety. Discover Psychology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/S44202-022-00023-9
Muir, A. (2024). Paul and Seneca within the Ancient Consolation Tradition. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004695528)
Muir, A. W. (2022). “Our πολίτευμα Belongs in Heaven” (Phil 3:20). Novum Testamentum, 64(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-BJA10011)
Muir, A. W. (2024a). Comparing Paul and Seneca on Consolation: How and Why. Paul and Seneca within the Ancient Consolation Tradition, 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004695528_003
Muir, A. W. (2024b). Defining Consolation in Antiquity: Traditions and Modes. Paul and Seneca within the Ancient Consolation Tradition, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004695528_002
Nelson, L. D., & Cantrell, C. H. (1980). Religiosity and Death Anxiety: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis. Review of Religious Research, 21(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3509880
Novosad, D. (2024). Seneca’s Use of Exempla as Therapeutics for Fear of Death in Moral Epistles. Folia Philosophica, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31261/FP.18189)
Noyes, R. (1973). Seneca on death. Journal of Religion & Health, 12(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01532829
Oropeza, B. J. (2024). The Gospel According to Paul: Over a Hundred Years of Interpretation. Religions, 15(12), 1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121566
Pandya, A. K., & Kathuria, T. (2021). Death anxiety, religiosity and culture: Implications for therapeutic process and future research. Religions, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/REL12010061
Park, J. (2020). The Identity of Death in 1 Corinthians 15:20–28: Understanding the Cosmic and Forensic Dimensions of Death in Paul. 신약연구, 19(1), 194–232. https://doi.org/10.24229/KENTS.2020.19.1.006
Pypłacz, J. (2016). Cyntia żywa i Cyntia umarła. Literacka gra z odbiorcą w elegii 4.7 Propercjusza. Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae, 26(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.14746/SPPGL.2016.XXVI.1.5
Weiss, R. L. (2021). Senecan Tragedy as Response to Stoic Critique. Journal of European Languages and Literatures. https://interface.org.tw/index.php/if/article/view/130/459
Wesołowska, E. (2015). Seneca in search of passing time. Classica Cracoviensia, 18, 475–490.
Wibowo, M., & Salurante, T. (2020). Kajian Biblika 1 Korintus 15: 1-11 Bagi Pemahaman Iman Kristen Tentang Kebangkitan Yesus Kristus. Manna Rafflesia, 7(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.38091/man_raf.v7i1.136
Wright, N. T. (2019). Resurrection and the Renewal of Creation. The Biblical Annals, 9(4), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.4784
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bonnarty Silalahi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ENCE TOOLS https://www.spus.c/r
cord/disply.urieid=2-s85163018790&origin=resultslist 







