REVIEWER GUIDELINES

To maintain and enhance the quality of JOSAPRAT (Journal of Spirituality and Practical Theology), we invite scholars with expertise in practical theology, Christian spirituality, and related fields to serve as reviewers. Your valuable insights and constructive feedback are essential in ensuring that the manuscripts published in JOSAPRAT meet high academic standards and contribute meaningfully to the field of theology and ministry.

Qualifications:

Potential reviewers must meet the following qualifications:

  • Hold a Master’s or Doctoral degree in theology, Christian spirituality, practical theology, or a related field.

  • Have expertise in spiritual formation, pastoral theology, Christian ethics, practical ministry, or other areas of applied theology.

  • Possess a strong publication record in practical theology, spirituality, or related theological disciplines, with articles published in internationally reputable journals and cited within the academic community.

  • Have prior experience as a reviewer for theological journals or academic publications.

Review Process:

When reviewing a manuscript for JOSAPRAT, please consider the following aspects:

Presentation:

  • Does the manuscript present a clear and cohesive argument based on Christian theological principles?

  • Are the ideas and conclusions logically structured and easy to follow? Does the manuscript demonstrate clarity in its contribution to practical theology or spirituality?

Writing:

  • Does the title accurately reflect the content and focus of the manuscript?

  • Is the writing clear, concise, and suitable for academic readers in the field of practical theology or Christian spirituality?

Length:

  • Are there sections of the manuscript that should be elaborated, shortened, or removed for clarity and focus? Does the length of the manuscript align with the subject matter and intended impact?

Title:

  • Does the title encapsulate the content of the manuscript in a concise, clear, and engaging way, suitable for theological discourse and ministry practice?

Abstract:

  • Does the abstract effectively summarize the research background, objectives, methods, findings, and contributions in the context of Christian spirituality and practical theology?

Introduction:

  • The introduction should include:

    • A background that clearly defines the research gap in practical theology or Christian spirituality.

    • A literature review that positions the research within the broader theological discourse.

    • The originality of the work and how it contributes to existing scholarship in practical theology or spiritual formation.

    • A clear statement of the study's objectives, outlining them effectively.

Methodology:

  • The methodology section should:

    • Provide a thorough description of the research procedures, including practical steps and the rationale for selecting particular methods.

    • Clearly identify the theological concepts or ministry contexts being examined.

    • Specify research variables (if applicable) and research instruments used (e.g., pastoral counseling approaches, ministry interventions).

    • Describe any analysis techniques, ensuring sufficient detail for reproducibility by other scholars or ministry practitioners.

Results:

  • The results should focus on practical theology, with processed data presented in a manner that is applicable to ministry or church settings.

  • Tables, figures, or charts should be used effectively to summarize key findings and support the interpretation of the theological or spiritual content.

  • The results should directly address the research questions or objectives posed earlier in the manuscript.

Discussion:

  • The author should provide an in-depth analysis of the results, particularly how they contribute to practical theology or spiritual formation.

  • The author should explain the broader implications of the research for ministry practice, church leadership, and theological reflection.

  • Strengths and limitations of the study should be clearly addressed. The discussion should not merely repeat the results but should engage critically with them.

Conclusion:

  • The conclusion should synthesize the main findings of the study, offering a clear summary that ties the results and discussion together.

  • The conclusion should be presented in effective academic sentences and should not be in bullet points or numbered lists.

  • New insights contributing to the development of practical theology, spiritual formation, or Christian ministry should be highlighted.

We greatly appreciate the time and effort of our reviewers. Your feedback helps maintain the academic integrity of JOSAPRAT (Journal of Spirituality and Practical Theology) and ensures that the journal continues to contribute to the advancement of Christian theology, spirituality, and ministry scholarship. Thank you for your invaluable service.